1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "A evidence Nos. 3 and 6 and testimony of witness Q of the trial" in Section 6 of Section 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "the former Special Measures Act"; "Nos. 3 and 6 shall be deemed as "the former Special Measures Act"; and Nos. 4 and 6 shall be deemed as "only the evidence Nos. 3 and 6 shall be deemed as "the testimony of witness Q of the trial"; and after Section 4 and 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the presumption of registration shall not be reversed solely on the ground that a guarantor under the Act on the Special Measures for the Relocation of the trial prepared a guarantee certificate to guarantee the change of right claimed by a registered titleholder without knowing the change of right (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Da2189, Apr. 29, 2005).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.