1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a corporation with the objective of guiding and supervising the affairs of B safe and promoting the enhancement of its common interest and sustainable development. The plaintiff is a person working as the president of C safe from February 16, 2007 (hereinafter "C safe of this case").

B. On January 24, 2015, the general meeting of the instant credit cooperative, with the approval of the Defendant, passed a draft budget for 2015 containing the content of raising the wages of the executives and employees in 2015 from 5.2% to 13% from 2014. The board of directors of the instant credit cooperative decided to re-determine the above rate of wage increase without the authority on February 6, 2015. The Plaintiff executed the budget for 2015 in accordance with the resolution of the board of directors. Meanwhile, in order to reduce the re-determination of the rate of wage increase and the excess of the budget, the Plaintiff made a false statement by pointing out the amount according to the resolution of the board of directors as to personnel expenses approved by the Defendant in the immediately preceding business plan for the year 2016.

(hereinafter “illegal resolution by the board of directors, excessive execution of personnel expenses, and false report at the general meeting.” From February 12, 2007 to April 29, 2016, the instant credit cooperative organized KRW 88,400,00 in the budget of the instant credit cooperative under the name of “income for employee inquiry” in the budget of the instant credit cooperative from February 12, 2007 to April 29, 201, and managed it in the employee D and E’s account. While ordinary investigation expenses, travel expenses, transportation expenses, welfare expenses, etc. were disbursed from the budget of the credit cooperative, the said employee’s regular investigation expenses, travel expenses, and welfare expenses

(hereinafter referred to as “inappropriate budget execution”). The instant credit cooperative general meeting specified the site subject to new construction of gas stations in 2014, and resolved to limit the purchase fund to one billion won. The instant credit cooperative’s officers and employees, including the Plaintiff, purchased the relevant site and additionally purchased the land without the resolution of the general meeting, and paid the cost in excess of 2.1 billion won.

hereinafter referred to as the "Board of Directors".