1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

In the case of the parties' status, in the ancient order, the church, the church, and the general assembly are established as a church, the church, the church, and the senior general meeting of the Korean Film Council (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant general meeting") as the highest council within the above religious order, which is in charge of managing the division and conflict within the religious order and dealing with various disputes, while taking overall control of the branch church and its affiliated organizations within the above religious order.

The D Labor Association (hereinafter referred to as the "D Labor Association") is an association under the jurisdiction of the defendant's general assembly which has jurisdiction over the E members, and the defendant Clocks (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Clocks Association") is a branch church under the D Labor Association, and the defendant B is the chairman of the party which is the representative of the defendant Clocks.

The plaintiff is a person who was the head of the defendant church.

On February 15, 2014, the defendant Ciplomatic Association (the members of a church shall consist of the pastors and the head of a church) decided to hold a joint council (the highest resolution body consisting of the members of a church) on February 23, 2014 for the recommendation of the plaintiff on February 23, 2014, and the joint council was held on February 23, 2014.

In the above joint council, the plaintiff, by means of a party letter prior to voting, was reported to the members that the plaintiff interfered with the resolution of the general council meeting, such as making the head of the standing tree room in front of the wooden room on February 9, 2014, making the head of the party room in November 17, 2012, making a serious bath to the head of the party room in the meeting room on November 17, 2012, ③ making verbal speech to the members of the party room in the meeting room on November 17, 2013, ④ repeatedly making inquiries about the same contents to the chairperson of the party meeting at each other for a long time, and repeatedly complying with the highest number of times, and thereafter, the plaintiff made a vindication as to the above reported contents.

Since then, as a result of voting at the above joint council, 33 votes against 92 votes among 135 voters;