Defendant

A Decision 201 Gohap 755, 2012 Gohap 392, 2012 Gohap 523, 2012 Gohap 570, 2012 Gohap 1331, 2012 Gohap 1331, 2012

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud and three years of suspended execution on September 1, 201 at the Suwon Fagwon, and Defendant A was sentenced to three years of suspended execution.

9. The judgment becomes final and conclusive, and Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of imprisonment with prison labor for four months at the veterinary method personnel on September 1, 201 and the same month.

9. The judgment became final and conclusive.

[ criminal facts] Defendant A is the representative director of corporation C in Sungnam-si N802, Sungnam-si, and Defendant B is a person who mediates the transfer of the right to operate a restaurant as well as Defendant A in the construction site by directly holding the above C Exclusive Affairs, and Defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of selling food wholesale and retail business.

“2011 Gohap 755 - Defendant A and B

1. Defendant A, who committed a crime, has been professionally authorized or arranged to operate a restaurant at the construction site.

O paid a certain amount of money, such as expenses for securing the right to operate a restaurant, which is located at an unspecified construction site, and theO acquired money under the name of transferring the right to operate a restaurant to a construction business operator, by maintaining the relationship between the Defendant and the prior payment of the expenses, etc. after obtaining the right to operate the restaurant in an unspecified construction site and transferring the right to operate the restaurant to the Defendant through the road, and by securing the relationship between the Defendant and the prior payment of the expenses, etc., to the om. The O collected money under the name of transferring the right to operate the restaurant on the construction site or the construction site where the owner did not know about the right to operate the restaurant at the construction site or the construction site where the actual owner failed.

A. On December 20, 2007, the criminal defendant against the victim P did not have the intent or ability to grant the victim P P (43 tax) the right to operate the restaurant at the site of the apartment construction site, but the victim had the right to operate the restaurant at the site of the apartment, “The victim already has the right to operate the restaurant at the site of the Incheon Q apartment by June 2008, the right to operate the restaurant and the restaurant at the site of the Ansan-si Housing Corporation, Ansan-si by April 2008.