Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2013, the Defendant testified at the Gwangju District Court located in 7-12, Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, that he was present and taken an oath as a witness of the case claiming unjust enrichment against the above court 2013Gahap50345 (C) and three other parties, and then, the Plaintiff’s agent testified that “A witness was unaware of D,” “A witness is not aware of D,” and at the same time, he was sent to Defendant E by telephone and was able to borrow money as Defendant E’s seat.”

However, there was no fact that the witness made a telephone conversation with E and D having borrowed money from E.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

A summary of the evidence (a testimony made by the defendant after the above testimony is asked who is D, but the answer that D was made from E can be recognized as the fact (126 pages of investigation records) that he heard D, and the defendant's testimony that "D is borrowed by telephone as E because it is necessary to pay money as E," is a testimony contrary to the defendant's memory).

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol of examination of the accused in the Gwangju District Court 2013Gau50345;

1. Application of the law to include some statements in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.