Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for four months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A would pay the installment to E without delay on the face of a week after purchasing the benz car in the name of E F.

In addition, under the above E’s permission to purchase a passenger car in the above F’s name, there was a charge of obtaining property benefits by receiving KRW 55 million from Aju Capital under the pretext of a loan to be used for a vehicle from Aju Capital, etc., which was tried at the Gwangju District Court as the case of fraud, such as fraud No. 2014 High Order 3016.

In order to obtain a verdict of innocence in the above trial, the defendant et al. had the P who tried to draw up each letter of agreement between the defendant and the above E with respect to the payment of the passenger car in question, and had the P make a false testimony.

On November 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around the 261st anniversary of the Dong-gu, Gwangju Northern District, the Defendant purchased the vehicle from the Party E to the Party E, and (b) paid in excess of bucks, to the Party E, instead of purchasing the vehicle.

“The court asked for false testimony at the court to the effect that “.....”

Accordingly, on January 16, 2015, the above P accepted the above request, and around 14:20 on January 16, 2015, in the court of Gwangju District Court 202 located in 7-12, Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, "E was confirmed by telephone, and E purchased the vehicle in the name of the wife and entered the vehicle, and the installment was paid to A.

“A false testimony contrary to one’s memory” was made to the effect that it was “.”

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated the above P with perjury.

2. On January 16, 2015, around 14:20, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Gwangju-dong law-abiding case No. 202, the Gwangju-dong District Court No. 2012, the Gwangju-dong District Court No. 7-12, and was notified by the presiding judge of the right to refuse to testify, and was given a false testimony, he/she was able to give testimony and give testimony by being punished for perjury.

Defendant 1 received the same teacher as described in the above 1 paragraph from the above A and consented to it, and the counsel’s “the witness” is a witness.