Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2018, the Defendant received a report from the victim D and the victim of the above church at the C church located in the area B of the party branch in Sungnam-si on December 15, 2018, and received a demand from the police officers dispatched to the church for delivery.

However, the defendant did not respond to this and did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave without justifiable reasons by not closing or leaving the toilets inside the church.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that he/she has the right to freely enter the church held as his/her believers, and therefore, he/she is required to leave.

There was a justifiable reason for failing to comply with the Gu.

The defendant shall not be subject to the crime of refusal to leave.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged.

The defendant is a member of the "C church" who was affected by the "C church," and is in common with the C church located in the Gu E in Young-gu, Young-gu.

However, since 2010, the defendant has received recommendations from church managers to leave the church for reasons such as leaving the church.

On December 15, 2018, the day of the instant case, the Defendant went to the ruling church that is the principal party of the C church.

At around 16:30 on the same day, the Defendant sent a letter to “one F” and expressed his wish to be involved in a book, and called G pastors.

Accordingly, the victim D and the defendant were only the victim D and the defendant, and the defendant stated that the defendant "I want to have 20 books."

The victim's right to ask the defendant for the next unconstitutionality is not the intention of the victim.