1. The Defendant’s successor intervenor KRW 895,479,062 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 10,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of these money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) On August 19, 2013, around 12:20 on August 19, 2013, Seoul DFIS vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”) around Gangnam-gu Seoul.

)A traffic accident that causes the Plaintiff who walked to A has occurred (see, e.g., attached Form A No. 2 at the site of the accident verification center; hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”).

2) As a result of the instant traffic accident, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as the lower half-brue, brue damage, neute damage, neutronism, neutronism, and leutronism.

3) Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s spouse. The Defendant is an insurer who concluded an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant transferred the entire business to the Defendant’s succeeding Intervenor on May 27, 2015, and at the same time transferred the insurance contract, the Defendant’s succeeding Intervenor succeeded to the rights and obligations under the instant insurance contract from the Defendant. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the purport of the entire entries and arguments set forth in subparagraphs A1 through 3,

B. According to the facts found earlier, the instant traffic accident occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, and there are no other circumstances to deem the cause attributable to the Plaintiff A. Thus, the Defendant’s successor, the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for all damages incurred by the instant traffic accident.

2. The cost shall be calculated in accordance with the headmanem method that deducts intermediate interest calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month in the scope of the liability for damages, and the amount below the cost and below the month for the convenience of the pem shall be discarded, and it shall be rejected that the parties’ claims are not separately explained.

Basic facts 1) Personal information 1: E-born and male 2. Monthly income: The life expectancy 3) the daily income of urban daily workers during the 22th day of each month and the end of life expectancy: The result of the physical commission to the head of the Guro University Hospital at Korea, Korea-U.S. (According to the rehabilitation department, according to the rehabilitation department, the plaintiff A's life expectancy is about 50% of the normal life of the plaintiff A, but it is judged that the life expectancy is about 50%.