A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On the 23:05 on October 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) on the way in Seopo-si C and D, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, 201; and (b) on the way in front of D, the Defendant: (c) reported and dispatched to the site; and (d) “Ief, Nena,” to the slopeF affiliated with Seopo-si E District, Seopo-si, Seopo-si

b) has been engaged in any activity;

6. Madle flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium

Francing eggs, francing the fransh of the above F, which prevents it, and francing the hand of the F, the said F f f f f f f f f f f f.

Therefore, although the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing the crime due to interference with the performance of official duties, the Defendant abused the Fbucks part of the F Fbucks to the patrol vehicle once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of on-site photographs and statutes governing damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Du1448, Jan. 1, 2009);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;