The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

A. The Defendant, around July 31, 2016, inserted Mebatop (one philop; hereinafter “philopon”) Meba (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) a local mental medicine he possessed at the office of Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, into a single-use injection machine, and injected it into the water.

B. On August 13, 2016, the Defendant posted philophones non-phones, which he had at E’s home, into a single-use injection machine, and injected them into water.

(c)

The Defendant, around September 17, 2016, posted philophones non-phones possessed by E at E’s home into one-time injection machine and melted them in water.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered philophones three times.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the judgment, there is a statement in the prosecution of E, a record containing the conversation between the defendant and E (No. 16 of the evidence list) and a reply to the request for appraisal.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence presented by the prosecutor, including the above evidence, was proven without any reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to prove.

A. The Defendant consistently denied the crime of medication, even though it is consistent with the fact that he/she frequently went to the E house by an investigative agency up to this court.

B. At first in the prosecution, E presented to the Defendant on July 31, 2016 that there was a philopon, and the Defendant responded to the administration, and the Defendant had a philopon possessed by the Defendant inside the house.

The following countries administered philophones, which were possessed in the house, even though they were not accurately memorys whether they first proposed, as well as in the house.

The defendant carried a philophone possessed by him into a toilet in a disposable injection machine, and the defendant directly sees the face of the me to administer.