beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, around 10:00 on February 16, 201, 201, at the Dong entrance of the F apartment management affairs of Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the victim G was prevented from entering the defendant, and the victim G was forced to enter the victim's bridge by her hand, and the victim exceeded the victim's floor, thereby suffering from the victim's 21 days of cryption.
Defendant A is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the F apartment in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seongbuk-gu, and Defendant B and Defendant C are the same representative of the above apartment.
On December 21, 2016, six apartment residents H et al. filed an application against Defendant A and Defendant B for the suspension of performing their duties on the grounds of the defect in the procedure for the selection of the representative meeting of the occupants at the Suwon District Court (the suspension of performing their duties on February 17, 2017). The victim I corporation's housing management service period from May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2018, the Defendants neglected this while the Defendants were taking the procedure for the selection of a new housing management entity around January 26, 2017 to select a new housing management entity, and the J corporation will use the above F corporation's office management and conference room as of February 16, 2017.
Although the victim company requested the side of the victim company, it was not possible after the expiration of the contract due to the victim company's legitimate procedure.
Nevertheless, on February 16, 2017, the Defendants jointly with 40 occupants and stated that the indictment was “after compulsory opening,” the first floor entrance door of the F apartment management office around February 16, 2017, but the occupants’ compulsory opening of the entrance door is at least 10 am on the same day, and it appears that they entered the entrance door at 18 am on the same day. This is contrary to the allegations of the Defendants, and there is a disadvantageous change to the Defendants.