logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.05.28 2014가합107172
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is a corporation with business purposes, such as multi-medial options business, business of selling computers and peripheral devices, wholesale and retail business of software and telecommunications equipment, and business of developing and supplying system applied software. The defendant is a corporation with business purposes of providing advice, development and supply of software, information system integration and construction, Arabic infrastructure business, and manufacturing and selling experiment equipment and materials for education.

B. On November 2012, 2012, the 1st day of the conclusion of the re-subcontract of this case: (a) the school foundation under the contract for services ordered by the Dayang Private Institutes for the construction of a school foundation is Hyundai United Nations Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Mona”).

The contract amount of KRW 4,268,288,00 (including value-added tax) and KRW 18 months from the date of conclusion of the contract execution period, agreed to establish a strategic plan for the promotion of smart campus construction projects at the Healthy University and enter into a contract to provide services to build an integrated information system. 2) The contract amount of KRW 4,03,000,000 (including value-added tax) to the Defendant around the beginning of November 2012 is written in Gap evidence 3-2 of the contract amount of KRW 4,00,000 (including value-added tax) with the Defendant around November 201.

The plaintiff asserts that the contract amount was KRW 4,030,000,000 as to the above contract, and is judged on the premise that the contract amount was agreed at KRW 4,030,000,00 due to the defendant's no dispute;

The contract execution period is 18 months from the date of the contract execution, and a strategic plan for the promotion of the smart campus construction project was formulated, and a subcontract was entered into for services to build an integrated information system as a contract cycle.

3 On March 15, 2013, the plaintiff in the re-subcontract between the plaintiff and the defendant is to promote the smart campus establishment project with the defendant.

arrow