logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고정2990
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as an operator of C, Defendant B, and Defendant E as the head of the above D’s business headquarters, the Defendants and E did not have the above D’s right to execute the project in Pyeongtaek-Jak International City Development Zone. As such, as the above D did not have the right to execute the project, the Defendants and E conspired to acquire money from other persons under the name of the deposit or introduction of the contract for the construction works in the project district.

Defendant

A receives a request from Defendant B to inquire about the other party to the contract for a set-off project, and around August 13, 2012, at the coffee shop located in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim I and J jointly operated with H and jointly with H and the victim I, “D will have the right to execute the new city development project in Pyeongtaek-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City. D will have the right to cut down 400,000 square meters at the prime place of contract.” The victim I and the victim I prepared the “contract for the service of cutting down a new city in Pyeongtaek-si Special Metropolitan City in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City” between the victim I and the victim I, and received KRW 5,000,000 from the said victim under the pretext of introduction.

E prepares a "private contract tree construction contract" between Defendant A and the above victim who introduced by Defendant D at the office located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jung-gu, Seoul, and Defendant B signed on the above contract while Defendant B was issued KRW 5 million from the above victim as the above victim could have done d construction work.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with E, enticed the above victim, and acquired the above victim's KRW 10 million from the above victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. The new city in Pyeongtaek-si;

arrow