logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2013.08.12 2013고합9
살인미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for 4 years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is married on January 21, 1985 and has a male E (28 years of age) and the male F (26 years of age) under the supervision of the defendant.

1. Upon receipt of a request from the above F for the necessity of money under the pretext of a fine, etc., the Defendant was aware that, even if he talks with the husband, the husband did not have to pay money to the F, the Defendant and D knew that there was a deposit money under the name of D, or that there was a deposit money borrowed under the name of E in the first place to make a marriage. The Defendant was living together with his husband, and the Defendant knew that the head of Tong, E’s name, identification card, seal, etc. (which kept E’s identification card and seal in order to establish the E’s head of Tong) were stored. The Defendant knew that the Defendant was the husband and the Defendant, while having known that he was the husband and the Defendant, and even if the Defendant was visiting the agricultural cooperative, the Defendant could have impliedly agreed on the termination of the deposit, and the Defendant was allowed to terminate the deposit money by using the name of Do, Do, Do, and Do, etc., and the said employee was returned to the said agricultural cooperative.

On May 25, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 11:06, in order to early termination of the fixed deposit amount of KRW 10 million in the name of the head of Nam Nam-gun, HFG G, the Defendant, using the pen in the paper for payment written form kept in the Agricultural Cooperative without the consent of the E, stated “I”, “F million won in the face value column, “E”, and “E” in the customer name column; and (b) marked the stamp attached to the E from his name.

The defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged a letter of request for payment in the name of E, a private document concerning rights and duties, from that time to that time,

8. By the same method until 29.2, set forth in the annexed List of Crimes (1) above, but set forth in 10.

arrow