All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's punishment (six months of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.

On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case is committed repeatedly by the defendant for a short period of time, in light of the crime history, method, frequency, etc., the poor quality of the crime, the total scale of the crime, and the fact that the defendant does not make any effort to recover damage, and thus, is disadvantageous to the defendant. Considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, economic condition, background, motive, means, frequency, size, etc., and circumstances after the crime, the punishment of the defendant is adequate, too heavy, or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.