All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant's imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.

While there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake as a senior citizen in society, the fact that he paid damages to some victims at the time of the trial, etc., each crime of this case is committed by deceiving money against an unspecified number of victims at the Internet goods transaction site, which is considerably poor in the quality of the crime, the total amount of damages exceeds 24 million won, and most damages have not been recovered, and there are disadvantageous circumstances to the defendant. Furthermore, considering all kinds of sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, environment, environment, health conditions, motive and consequence, means and consequence, period, size, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below shall be appropriate, and it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the defendant is too heavy or uncompared.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.