1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On September 23, 1989, the Plaintiff was established for the purpose of selling and repairing motor vehicles and handled the sales and services of C and D motor vehicles. On March 18, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the registration of small motor vehicle comprehensive maintenance business with respect to the service center located in Goyang-si E (hereinafter “Plaintiff Center”).

B. At the Plaintiff Center on August 22, 2018:

9.5., January 24, 2019:

5.2.4 On a quarterly basis, FG vehicles (owner H Co., Ltd. and October 31, 2017; hereinafter “instant vehicle”) were maintained.

(c)

A civil petition is filed on November 4, 2019 by a person who uses the instant vehicle to the Defendant for the purpose that the damage to the property was caused by amending the written estimate and specifications for inspection and maintenance of the instant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “detailed specifications”) without issuing a written statement on the vehicle inspection and maintenance (hereinafter referred to as “written statement”), and the specifications issued by the Plaintiff as of October 31, 2019 (the following specifications).

In the case of the specifications falling under the 2 and 4 in the paragraph, the documents were submitted, and the public official in charge of the defendant submitted a field investigation to the plaintiff center on November 19, 11, and the part not issued in the statement was confirmed by the head of the plaintiff branch, and the other part cannot be found excessive maintenance or there is no obligation to issue a written estimate in the case of repair of the guarantee, unlike civil petitioners' assertion.

(d)

With respect to the maintenance of the instant vehicle on the four occasions, the Plaintiff is a detailed statement as follows (C above).

All of the specifications of subsections are affixed with the seal of the person in charge of maintenance, but in the case of the specifications 2 and 4 submitted by the plaintiff with Gap evidence No. 2, there is no seal of the person in charge of maintenance.

On October 31, 2019, the date of requesting the maintenance and the date of release of the inspection. - Without consent or non- consent, there is no consent or non- consent on the part as to whether the additional maintenance is approved, signature or customer, public disturbance in the part of the maintenance, the date of issuance of I to the owner or customer, the date of request for the maintenance and inspection, and the date of September 5, 2018 as of the date of request for the maintenance;