Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2016, at around 15:00, the Defendant parked the Defendant’s car at the end of parking in the Dialary parking lot operated by the victim C in Sungnam-si, the Sinnam-si, and made it impossible for the Defendant to pass the vehicle to the D office operated by the victim by linking the electric wires from the Defendant’s residential area to the said car, thereby obstructing the victim’s work related to D business over several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, and F;

1. A complaint (including photographs attached thereto);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to CDAs);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Around June 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 11:30, 201; and (b) around 200,000 won in the market value of the victim’s ownership, such as breaking a breab box owned by the victim; and (c) breaking a breabbbbb, in which the brea was installed.

2. The judgment is affirmed by the Defendant: (a) while he was fluoring the part of his house and fenced to build a passage along the road, he was fluoring the breab box of the victim who was he sculed with the wall at the time, and sculing the part of the victim at the time; (b) according to the CCTV screen, etc. where the victim was sculing the part of the victim at the time, the Defendant was sculing the brub in the process of moving the breabbbbb in order to secure work space; and (c) the Defendant was sculing the brubb in the box which was immediately sculed on the floor; and (d) on the other hand, at the time, the brebrub box was fluor to return the brub box to G head office, but it was difficult for the victim to return the brebrud because the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone alone

lack of sufficient evidence to consider.

Therefore, at the time.