The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, who spits the Defendant’s face, was guilty of all the charges of this case, even though he did not injure the victim FF or assault the victim G, although the Defendant spits the Defendant’s spits with spits. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Defendant was in a state of mental and physical loss or mental weakness under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

(c)

The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

가. 사실 오인 주장에 대한 판단 (1) 원심에서 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 원심 판시 범죄사실 기재와 같이 피해자 F이 구걸 통을 발로 찼다는 이유로 피고인이 피해자 F의 팔 부위를 세게 잡아 못 움직이게 하였고, 곧바로 E는 피해자 F의 턱 부위를 발로 차서 상해를 가하였으며, 이에 피해자 F의 일행인 피해자 G이 피고인 등을 말리려 하자 피고인이 주먹으로 피해자 G의 얼굴 부위를 때려 폭행한 사실이 넉넉히 인정된다.

(2) The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant is not liable for the injury to the victim F due to the assault by E.

"When two or more persons jointly commit a crime of injury or assault" under Article 2 (2) of the Punishment of Violences, Violence, etc. Act requires that there exists a so-called co-offender relationship between them. They should be the case where several persons are aware of another person's crime in the same opportunity at the same place, and used it to commit the crime (see Supreme Court Decision 90Do2153 delivered on January 29, 191). However, in the case of joint principal offenders committing a crime through joint processing by two or more persons, a certain punishment of conspiracy or conspiracy is required under the law.