(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.01.18 2018고단1989

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.01.18 2018고단1989

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months at the Cheongju District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2017.

On July 17, 2015, the defendant called the Kamera sales store operated by the victim B and obtained the introduction of the head of the D division belonging to the Co., Ltd., which does not have an intention or ability to sell the Kamera normally, and if the defendant sent the Kamera price to the victim, he/she would sell 100 Kamera in the 17th of the same month, and he/she acquired 31,000,000 won from the victim as the 17th of the same month from the victim to the F account in the name of the defendant.

On September 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months at the Cheongju District Court on September 28, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2017.

1. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant had worked in H, but at the time, the Defendant had no intention or ability to supply the goods to the victim I in a normal manner even if he had already left the H and received the goods at H, and would deliver 200 and 100 cash receipts to the victim I. The Defendant would request the Defendant to transfer the advance payment before receiving the goods, and then the Defendant shall receive from the victim a remittance of KRW 200,000,000 as the price for the goods of J Kara and 100,000,000 won as the price for the goods.

2. On July 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) did not intend or have the ability to normally supply the goods, even if having received the price of the goods, and (b) did not intend to supply the goods to the victim I with the amount equivalent to KRW 2.90,00,000 per Emeras; and (c) issued a tax invoice; (b) did so falsely; and (c) the Defendant received the amount of goods from the victim to the K bank account in the name of the victim in charge of the transaction to receive KRW 58,00,000 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1989"

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2018.04.18 2017고단2098

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.11.08 2018고단993

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2020.02.12 2019고단1409

-부산지방법원 2015.04.22 2014고정2659

-수원지방법원안산지원 2020.09.04 2020고단632