Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2013, the Defendant, together with C, conspiredd with C, as if the Defendant leased the D Building 1117, which is the owner of C in Busan, with the nameless fraud loan brobe and around August 2013, to receive a loan from the financial institution for lease on a deposit basis.

On August 8, 2013, according to the above public offering, the Defendant made a false statement to the employees in charge of loaning the name-free loan amounting to KRW 30,000,000 for the lease deposit and KRW 2 years from August 13, 2013 for the lease contract term to the employees in charge of lending the lease deposit at the victim bank 186 located in the Busan High-gu Busan High-gu branch.

However, in fact C had already leased the said real estate to E on September 201, 201, for two years from September 18, 201, the lease term was 100 million won and the lease term was 2 years from September 18, 201, and there was no actual contract with the Defendant or there was no promise to enter into

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with C and the above-mentioned names, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20,000,000 from the victim through the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of F around August 13, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of all Acts and subordinate statutes to a statement of account transactions (F, Nonghyup, and A pre-household application documents;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment, the selection of fines (including the cases where the degree of punishment and the scale of gains actually acquired are minor, the total amount of fraud has been refunded, and the case where the mistake of the person concerned is divided and reflected in depth);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.