beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, by a fine of KRW 700,000, by a fine of KRW 300,00.
The Defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A’s name failure to obtain the loan from the financial institution on the ground that the loan to ordinary people and employees of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, which was operated by the National Housing Fund as the financial resources of the State, consists of a document screening without due diligence, was based on the false lessee.
The full liability in name is the overall control over all the affairs such as the name holder and the lessor's interference with the loan of the above lease contract, the certificate of employment in the name of the lessee, the certificate of income withholding, the distribution of income withholding, etc., and the distribution of the loan of the lease contract. The liability in name is the representative of the lessor or the lessee, the H is the representative of the tenant, and the H is the representative of the false certificate of employment or the certificate of income tax withholding in the name of the lessee. The defendant A, the lessor, even though being aware of the above circumstances, was to prepare a false lease contract and distribute the loan of the lease contract according
On September 2012, Defendant A and the lesseeJ prepared a false certificate of employment, income tax withholding certificate, etc. in the lessee’s name with respect to Defendant A’s 401 located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Defendant A and the lessee, the lessor, and H prepared a false lease contract with the knowledge of the above circumstances.
After that, around September 2012, J submitted a false certificate of employment that it works for K (State) at a non-economic region of the victim company bank located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and documents related to loan loans, such as a false lease agreement, and it received from the victimized bank the amount of KRW 55,00,000 from the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant around September 14, 2012.
Accordingly, in collusion with H et al., Defendant A received KRW 55,000,000 from the affected bank as a loan for the entire loan.
2. Defendant B L and H are N apartment at the time of strike owned by M around January 2013.