A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on August 30, 2015, sold a used car sales employee, as if the victim E was actually owned by the Defendant and the Gnish-gu car registered in the name of F was not established any security right. The Defendant sold a used car as a used car sales employee in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on August 30, 2015.

However, in fact, although a mortgage was established on the passenger car above, the defendant did not notify the victim of this fact in the passenger car above, although the mortgage was established on the creditor BNK Capital Co., Ltd., debtor F, and the maximum amount of the claim 11.2 million won.

The Defendant deceptioned the victim as such, and received from the victim the total sum of KRW 14.65 million during the period from September 3, 2015.

The Defendant, on September 16, 2015, extended KRW 20 million to the victim’s “J office” in the “J office for the operation of the victim I in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about September 16, 2015.” If the Defendant extended KRW 20 million to the victim for purchasing a fake A6 vehicle, then the Defendant would pay KRW 20 million by the last day of the loan.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the Defendant did not have any plan to purchase the AD vehicle at all, and even if the Defendant already borrowed money from the damaged party in the status of 70 million won or more, the Defendant did not have any intent and ability to pay the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 20 million won from the victim to the defendant's account on the same day.

"2016 Highest 601"

1. On September 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Seogu Daegu-dong, Seogu, Daegu-gu; (b) “The amount of tax has been adjusted; (c) the Defendant extended the 1 unit of Kussscis in the name of the president.”

I would like to complete the payment.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the facts are that the defendant is unable to pay a debt equivalent to KRW 70,000,000,000 from his son, and he is in the name of the victim.