A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No person of the 2019 Highest 3608 shall borrow or lend any access medium or keep, deliver or distribute such medium in return for payment, demand or promise.

Nevertheless, on May 29, 2019, the Defendant heard that the Defendant would lend KRW 4,00,000 to Kwikset Service Articles who are not aware of the name of the Defendant at around 29, 2019, “on the face of sending the e-mail card so that it can pay gold and interest,” and on the same day, the Defendant issued a letter of e-mail card connected to the CKwikset Service Articles in the name of the Defendant, and notified the password.

As a result, the Defendant promised to return to a person who is not aware of his name in return for an intangible expected interest of future loans.

【2020 Highest 1320】

1. On April 12, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle I under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.196% from the front of “F” in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, to the front of “H” in the same Gu’s “H” road; (b) around 700 meters away from the 700-meter section to the same Gu’s “H” road; and (c) driven a vehicle I under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.196%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) is a person who is engaged in driving of IAD motor vehicles.

At the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, while driving the said AFD car, and the Defendant continued to drive the said AFD on the front of the “K” fire-fighting road located in the Daegu Western-gu J from the “L” side to the 30km speed from the front side of the “L” side to the front side of the CF.

At the time, the passage of pedestrians is frequent without distinction between the vehicular road and India. In such a case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of the motor vehicle to live well and drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and did not properly live in the front.