Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for one year and six months, and Defendant C for 10 months, and Defendant D and E for eight months, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E [Public Offering Relations] Defendant A, who had sexual intercourses with women, with the victim F (31 years of age) by running contact with and singing singing, etc. Defendant A had the sexual intercourses with the victim F (31 years of age). In order to attract the agreed money by manipulating the situation as if he had been rape, and Defendant B (this name: G) who is a part of society, proposed the above crime to obtain consent.

Defendant

B In order to commit the above crimes, he interfered with Defendant C, Defendant C, who was aware of his reputation, or Defendant D, who was aware of his reputation, and Defendant D, who was aware of his reputation, respectively.

Defendant

A introduced the victim's contact and singing, leading the victim to commit all crimes, leading the victim's contact and singing, leading the victim's contact and singing, leading the victim's recipient's contact and singing, leading the defendant D and the defendant E to live together with the defendant's behavior, leading the victim's sexual intercourse, leading the victim's sexual intercourse, leading the victim's sexual intercourse, leading the victim to the victim's sexual relationship, and leading the victim's sexual intercourse. The defendant D and the defendant C conspired each other in order to attack the victim.

[2] The crime committed by Defendant A, by telephone, introduced that the victim “to introduce a person who is required to take over a singing,” and induced the victim to “the victim,” on December 10, 2014, at around 20:0, Suwon-gu H and the second floor “I party room,” and introduced that the victim is the person who will take over the Defendant B, and divided acquisition-related stories.

I want to take the victim in a nearby ‘J' restaurant, and then drink together with Defendant D, Defendant E, who was the most food for customers in advance at that place.

Since then, Defendant A’s indictment is written as “Defendant F,” but it is obvious that it is a clerical error and correct it without any changes in the indictment.