A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 201, 201, the Defendant found D's building that was known as a result of the introduction by the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the building, and displayed the building drawings, etc., and stated that "No construction fund is sufficient to construct three types of a 10-story apartment building in the eth of the 10th floor in the city Eth in large city. The application for a building permit was made for viewing and the permission was made only the date of permission. On the other hand, the construction will begin immediately. The investment of KRW 100,000 will begin with the branch of the building: (a) give preferential right to purchase the unit of the unit of the building, and if the Defendant refuses to obtain the right to purchase the unit of the building, he/she will refund KRW 1,81

However, the Defendant did not purchase the above apartment site, and the above site was a site exceeding the average gradient 20,000, and it was said that it was the date of permission by filing an application for building permission with the victim without sufficient examination. On June 7, 2012, the pre-announcement of partial amendment of the Ordinance on Urban Planning to allow permission after deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee, if the average gradient exceeds 20,000, was made on June 28, 2012, and only the site with an average gradient of less than 20,000 as the original land was deferred at the meeting of the Industrial Construction Committee, and it was impossible to construct the apartment site in the above E-building site. At the time, there was no special property of the Defendant at the time, and it was very uncertain whether the PF loan was possible, and thus there was no intention or ability to sell the right to purchase the apartment building, or to redeem the principal and interest of the company by constructing it to the victim even if it was received from the victim.

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2012, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and deceivings it from the victim to the Busan Bank account in the name of the Defendant, KRW 75 million;

2.7.25 million won in total shall be remitted.