logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.12 2016가단5159176
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit as to the conjunctive claim against the defendant main construction company shall be dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 당사자의 지위 1) 원고는 수원시 장안구 송정로 146(조원동)에 있는 상훈휴팰리스아파트(이하 ‘이 사건 아파트’라고 한다

(2) For the management of 48 households, the Defendant Awards and Decorations Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Awards and Decorations Construction”) is the contractor of the instant apartment construction and the seller of the instant apartment, and Defendant Jeju Special Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Jeju Special Construction”) is the contractor as the contractor of the instant new apartment construction, and Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance”) is the following.

The guarantor who entered into the warranty contract for the apartment of this case, such as paragraph (1).

B. From the date of the pre-use inspection to 12,00-200-2015-14-9155, 12,020, 480 210-200-00-2015-201, 2000 30-2000-2000-2015-2000 310-314-9156 from the date of the pre-use inspection to 24,040-9158 from the date of the pre-use inspection to 24,04,040-960 410-200-2015, 960 - 960 - 100-201, 205 - 106, 2005 - 106, 2016-15 - 306, 2005 of the instant pre-use inspection to the Mayor.

3. On the other hand, Defendant.

arrow