1. The defendant (Counterclaim defendant) corporation B is the 1,400,321,450 won, and the defendant C is the 207,380 won.

All counterclaims filed by the principal lawsuit and Defendant B shall be considered together.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around May 2007, the Military Mutual Aid Association C&C (hereinafter “Military Mutual Aid Association”) (hereinafter “Military Mutual Aid Association”) carried out the “specific service business for each of three generations in the future type (the name of the business was changed to the “Radio Integrated Service Integration Business” in 2009)” in order to provide various multimedia services at the same level as that of the private society for military soldiers. For this purpose, D (hereinafter “D”) was carried out with D, a telecommunications equipment manufacturer, to build IMO and add equipment to the Military Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “Military Mutual Aid Association”) through a telecommunications company.

(2) During the instant project, the instant telecommunications company: (a) was set up for Sejong Telecom; and (b) Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) intended to receive mms equipment from D and re-delivery for Sejong Telecom.

D The representatives of E and Defendant B, who were in charge of public sector operations, consulted primarily on the formation of IMO equipment, system design, etc. for the project of this case, and E and D provided technical basic data to the Military Mutual Aid Association by providing the Military Mutual Aid Association, and the Military Mutual Aid Association prepared and revised a written request for project proposal of this case to be provided to the Military Mutual Aid Association for a period of time, such as Sejong Telecom.

(3) Since D is required to supply goods only to a designated company as a business partner in Korea, Defendant B made a verbal agreement around December 2007, through the Plaintiff, who is D’s business partner, to be supplied with IMO equipment for the instant business proceeding.

Accordingly, Defendant B ordered IMO equipment to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff imported mms equipment from D and supplied it to Defendant B, and Defendant B attempted to supply ms equipment to Defendant B for the final supply of the ms equipment to Sejong Telecom to the Military Mutual Aid Association and the instant project.