logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.05.14 2019가단78117
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant,

A. Attached Form

1. As to each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 through 8 of the list, attached Form 2.1 to the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. I residing in H, 1925.11.5, 1926.1.5, 1926.3.8, 1923.10, 1923.10, 1923.25, 1923, 1923.25, 1924, 1924.28, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1926, 1925, 194.4, 192, 1924, 5, 5, and 6, 1924, 1926, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 4

B. The Defendant completed each registration of preservation of ownership on each parcel of land listed in [Attachment I] Nos. 1 through 8 on the ground that it is non-real estate, and the land listed in [Attachment I] No. 9 is currently unregistered.

C. The Plaintiffs’ vessel J had Plaintiff A, the deceased, the deceased, the deceased, and the deceased on April 10, 1970 between the wife K and the deceased on August 17, 2009.

In addition, the network L was composed of Plaintiffs C and C, the South-North, the wife N, and died on April 15, 1975, and NN died on December 21, 2004.

The network M had the Plaintiff G and son F between the wife Plaintiff E and his wife.

The Plaintiffs succeeded to the property of the deceased J, such as the list of inheritance shares in attached Form 2.

It was confirmed that there is no Dong name "I" in the name of "I" in the Orith of the Dongcheon-gun of Gyeonggi-do.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, fact-finding results on Qin-gun of Gyeonggi-do, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In full view of the evidence mentioned above as to whether the plaintiffs' preference and purchaser I coincide with each other and the fact-finding results on Q dismissal of this court, the list No. 1 is listed in the annexed sheet.

arrow