logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2021.01.28 2020가합100325
소유권이전등기
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 9, 1912, 1912, Nos. B, 1,473 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) of the real estate listed in the separate sheet was considered to be owned by the Plaintiff’s fleet C. On February 12, 1923, the ownership preservation registration was completed in the net C.

2) On May 30, 1924, each of the instant real estate is divided into “C, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun,” and “E” (hereinafter “F 00 pages”), and D on December 10, 1957, into D, G, and H.

3) On December 3, 1924, D indicated as transfer of ownership to I and E to J.

November 9, 1912, 1923

2. 12. 1924 (lease 13)

5. Transfer of DH E ownership transfer on December 10, 1957, 30. Division 30. Division 1924 (General 13. 13. 12. 3. 1957 DH E ownership transfer on December 10, 195.

B. D’s ownership transfer in succession to I, K, and L, and the ownership preservation registration was completed on June 20, 1962, and M’s ownership transfer was completed on the same day.

2) After transferring the ownership to N on April 7, 1937, E transferred the ownership, the registration for ownership preservation was completed on September 26, 1957, and the ownership was completed toO on the same day.

3) Each of the instant real estate was replaced by the following around July 1989, and around March 2006, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of acquisition of public land through consultation, and on October 10, 2012, the change of administrative jurisdiction into the boundary of the zone was made on October 10, 2012.

The fact that there is no dispute over the current number D QR EST MT MV MWX (based on recognition), Gap 6-8, 15, 17, 19, 21, and the purport of the entire pleadings, after the land substitution was made once before the land substitution was made.

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff solely succeeded to the deceased C’s capital loss and each of the instant real estate.

The net C is the owner who completed the registration for the preservation of ownership in accordance with the circumstances of each of the instant real estate.

Each of the instant real estate was divided into four parcels, and the Republic of Korea, N, L, and Y regarding the divided land.

arrow