The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) was that the Defendant unilaterally returned the oxygen in the D office, and did not interfere with his/her business by unilaterally leaving the D office by his/her employees, and did not interfere with his/her business, such as breaking a large amount of noise or noise.

2. The court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly admitted and adopted by the court below, i.e., ① the defendant taken a small-type camccos in the shape of the pentp, without permission, to ensure that he returned to the office, after finding out the office of the enemy with a little amount of time to be returned. The defendant taken the office of the defendant's purchase in order to ensure that he returned to the office without permission; ② the defendant avoided a large amount of noise compared to the employees who restrain him; ② it seems clear that it would interfere with the victim's business, such as new students' education, preparation, etc. conducted within the D office, etc., the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.