1. The Defendant purchased and sold shares on February 12, 2007 with respect to 1/2 shares of 2248 square meters of forests and fields D in Yangju-si, Yangju-si.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, and Eul evidence No. 5, the plaintiff (appointed party, Eul's father) and Eul (the defendant's mother) representing the defendant on February 12, 2007, concluded a sales contract with the content of selling 1/2 shares of D forest land No. 2248 square meters (hereinafter "real estate of this case") to the defendant for the purchase price of KRW 30 million at the Yangju-si.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to take over the application procedure for the transfer registration of ownership from the Selection C on February 12, 2007 with respect to the real estate in this case.

On the other hand, the defendant asserts to the effect that, since the real estate of this case at the time constitutes a land transaction permission zone and is the 1/2-shared share that is not a land transaction permission zone at the present time, there was no intention to purchase. The plaintiff (appointed party) misleads the defendant's mother E to enter into a sales contract by making the defendant who does not have any grounds for disqualification for a land transaction permission, and by forging the letter of debt succession (Evidence A No. 3), the plaintiff (appointed party) made the defendant take over the debt that the plaintiff (appointed party) bears to scark-hee in lieu of the payment of the balance, the above sales contract is null and void.

The plaintiff (Appointed Party) led the plaintiff (Appointed Party) to enter into a sales contract by deceiving E.

The defendant's assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to prove that the letter of obligation succession was forged or that it was forged.

Therefore, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.