Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2012, Defendant A, who cultivated the land adjacent to the land owned by the victim, as the owner of the land adjacent to the Party E, which is the land owned by the victim D, and displayed a boundary that the victim would no longer cultivate, and around April 2012, Defendant A walked red strawers installed by the victim to display the land boundary near the boundary line of the said land owned by the victim and made it impossible to recognize the boundary of the land owned by the victim by leaving the chill to the chill for the purpose of marking the boundary.

2. Defendant B: (a) performed cultivation to the land owned by the victim of Pyeongtaek-si adjacent land E, which is the land owned by the victim D; (b) displayed a boundary that the victim would no longer cultivate; (c) around April 2012, the Defendant extracted posts installed by the victim to indicate land boundary near the boundary line of the said victim’s land adjacent to the Defendant’s land; and (d) made it impossible to recognize the boundary of the land owned by the victim by the victim as a twitter because the twiter, which was created by the victim’s work to display boundary.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each divided survey result map and a certified copy of cadastral map;

1. Boundary installation photographs, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 370 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.