beta
Cases
2017Do17689 Violation of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act
Defendant
1. A;
2. W cooperatives (formerly changed: B cooperatives);
Appellant
Defendants
Defense Counsel
Law Firm Q (For the Defendants)
Attorney S, R
Judgment of the lower court
Suwon District Court Decision 2017No293 Decided October 13, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
April 26, 2018
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine on interpretation of the scope of a person who committed a crime under the main sentence of Article 16(3) of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act and the scope of approval for change of use under the
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Kim So-young
Justices Go Young-young
Justices Kim Jong-il
Chief Justice Cho Jae-chul, Justice Cho Jae-chul, Justice Cho Jae-sik, Counsel for the defendant-appellant