logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.23 2017가합57493
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants’ real estate corresponding to each Defendant indicated in the “real estate subject to delivery” column of attached Table 1 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Fact 1) The Defendants’ real estate as indicated in the “real estate subject to delivery” column of attached Table 1 owned by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

(2) As of October 13, 2017, the Defendants agreed to pay a rent by the end of each month, and that the lessor may terminate the lease contract if the lessee fails to pay the rent for at least three consecutive months. (2) As of October 13, 2017, the Defendants were liable to pay the rent continuously for the pertinent period by each Defendant indicated in the “number of months in arrears of rent” column in the attached Table 1.

[Ground of recognition] The defendants P, AB, and AI: Gap evidence 1-32,70,84, Gap evidence 2-32,70,84, Gap evidence 32-32,70,84, Gap evidence 3-32,70, and 84, and the remaining defendants: The confession (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Plaintiff may terminate the lease agreement on each of the instant real estate concluded with the Defendants on the grounds of the Defendants’ delinquency in payment of rent, and the fact that the duplicate of the complaint of this case containing the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the lease agreement was clearly recorded in the record that each of the instant real estate was delivered to the Defendants. Thus, the lease agreement on each of the instant real estate concluded

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each of the instant real estate, which is the leased object, to the Plaintiff.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.

arrow