The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B-to-purd.

On June 4, 2019, at around 20:18, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded to turn to the left from the side of the E religious organization at the Fhigh school without a distinction between D's front vehicular road and the sidewalk in F.C.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and operation of the steering direction and operation system with the right and the right and the right and the right and to make a left-hand turn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and followed the front side of the victim G (the age of 58) who was walking on the front side of the road by negligence, and followed the front side of the above vehicle, and followed the front side of the victim's right bridge going beyond the road by the front side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to such occupational negligence, i.e., a felbling of the right felling executives who need treatment for about 14 weeks.

2. The crime of this case is not prosecuted against the victim's express intent (the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents), and since a document containing the victim's expression of intention not to punish the defendant has been submitted to this court, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.