logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 12. 13. 선고 2018두54200 판결
(심리불속행) 어민의 면세유 부정수급 확인을 위해 어민 및 어선 상황을 확인하여야 함에도 수협이 이를 이행하지 않아 관리 부실의 책임이 있음.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daegu High Court-2017-Nu-6793 (2018.06)

Title

(S) Although the situation of fishermen and fishing vessels should be checked to confirm the illegal supply and demand of tax-free fishermen, they are not implemented by the fisheries cooperative and are responsible for poor management.

Summary

(In the original instance), the agreement, which is ultimately responsible for the management of the duty-free oil, needs to be thoroughly verified in the examination of the documents to issue the duty-free oil purchase card, and it shows that the plaintiffs were unaware of the fact that the management agency was not aware of the fact that the plaintiffs were negligent in managing the duty-free oil.

Related statutes

Article 106-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

2018Du54200 Revocation of imposition, including value-added tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA Fisheries Cooperatives and 7

Defendant-Appellee

AA Head of the tax office and 2

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 2017Nu6793 Decided July 6, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 13, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow