The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, without changing the contents of the instant game product, committed the game automatically without changing the contents of the instant game product and without manipulating the operating server. As such, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have provided game products of different contents to customers for use.

Nevertheless, the court below accepted the facts charged in this case as it is and found the defendant guilty. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below classified the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) commercial repair, which is a game provided in the game of this case, is the game for users to obtain free gifts from a straw w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w.