1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the application for succession participation at the trial court, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of the pertinent part among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Revised and added parts

A. The judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim on the main claim on February 20, 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified to “the existence of the obligation to pay the remainder on February 2,” and the judgment on the Defendant’s counterclaim and counterclaim claim on March 9 of the judgment of first instance is modified to “3. The judgment on the Defendant’s counterclaim and counterclaim claim on the Plaintiff’s main claim, the Defendant’s counterclaim and counterclaim claim, and the judgment on the Plaintiff’s successor’s claim”

B. Of the 5th and 6th of the judgment of the first instance, “the result of this court’s entrustment to appraiser G and the result of each request for the supplementation of expert evidence” shall be modified to “the result of the first instance court’s entrustment to appraiser G, the result of the request for the supplementation of expert evidence, and the result of the request for the supplementation of expert evidence in the trial.”

In the 12th part of the judgment of the first instance, “the result of the request for appraisal and the result of the request for appraisal supplementation to the appraiser G” in the 12th part of the judgment of the first instance shall be modified to “the result of the request for appraisal by the first instance court for the appraiser G, the result of the request for appraisal supplementation and the result

In the 20th of the first instance judgment, “the result of this court’s entrustment of expert G and the result of each request for the supplementation of expert evidence” in the 12th of the first instance judgment shall be amended to “the result of the expert G with respect to the appraiser G, the result of the entrustment of expert evidence supplementation, and the result of the request for the supplementation of

In the 14th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, "professional examiners of this court" shall be amended to "professional examiners of the first instance court".

C. 63,00,000 won [63,00,000 won [60,000 won [60,071,760 won [60,179,40 won [60,00 won for new installation of a new expense for removing drrawls]] x 63,00,000 won [63,00 won [60,071,760 won for removing drrawls] x 150,179,400 won x 30%], and 10%.