1. The Defendant’s decision on collection of unjust enrichment against the Plaintiff on March 20, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Details of the disposition

On October 31, 2008, the Plaintiff provided treatment to B, who was located in the National Assembly member of Socheon-gu Party A located in Socheon-gu, the Plaintiff, which was established and operated by himself, for the treatment of the injury to the left-hand 1 balance of 1 balance of 1 balance of Y, the aggregate of 2 balance of the left-hand 2 balance of Y, brain-dead, rheat, and acute confectional rheat, and K-G-Drat

B filed an application with the Defendant for the payment of industrial accident insurance benefits for the above injury and disease with the “E located in Ansan-si Member D”, and the Defendant approved the application and paid the insurance benefits of KRW 88,927,830,00,000 in total, including the industrial accident compensation benefits of KRW 35,246,030, industrial accident compensation benefits of KRW 7,279,290,290, disability lump-sum disability benefits of KRW 42,012,70, disability pension of KRW 4,378,460, and disability pension of KRW 4,000.

On the other hand, on December 4, 2008, B applied to the Defendant for the additional injury and disease approval of the post-sign escape certificate No. 3-4 of the 3-4 of the 1908, but the Defendant rejected the approval on the ground that the post-sign escape certificate between the 3-4 of the 3-4 of the 1999.

On June 19, 2014, the public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office prosecuted the Plaintiff for the crime of aiding and abetting the Plaintiff to receive insurance proceeds of KRW 33,725,783 from Samsung F&M, etc., by pretending that he/she was the MRI film of another person's He/she believed that he/she was the MRI film on the part of the He/she's He/she's He/she's He/she's He/she's He/she on the part of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, under the presumption that he/she was the MRI film of B, the Plaintiff was the Mali film of the other person's He/she's He/she's He/she was the Malith, and the Malith and the Malithization surgery, including taking the hospital's hospitalization from the victim's post office on January 14, 2009.

On November 11, 2014, the Defendant: “Revocation of approval of industrial accident insurance medical care (medical care plan)” on the ground that “the Defendant, as if he/she had suffered a disaster in the course of performing his/her duties, fabricated the circumstances of the accident, thereby obtaining approval of industrial accident insurance medical care from the Defendant.”