1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

가. 원고는 2012. 5. 31.부터 유한회사 B의 공장에서 근무하였는데, 2012. 10. 11. 25kg의 사료 포대를 차에 싣는 과정에서 허리를 삐끗하는 부상(이하 ‘이 사건 부상’이라고 한다)을 입었다.

B. The Plaintiff obtained medical care approval from the Defendant regarding the escape from the cirical base and the conical signboard No. 4-5 of the cirical base due to the instant injury.

On July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to the removal of a conical signboard with respect to the escape certificate of the said conical signboard, but the symptoms, such as a converging, continued, received an additional examination of the escape certificate of the conical signboard between No. 3-4 of the Pacific Year, and filed an application for the additional injury and disease with the Defendant on January 21, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).

C. On January 29, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of an additional injury and disease on the ground that the Plaintiff did not seem to have any opinion on the escape from a conical signboard No. 3-4 during the MIM’s inspection.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the revocation of the foregoing additional non-approval disposition by the Jeonju District Court 2015Gudan66.

On April 12, 2017, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s assertion that “the existence of proximate causal relation between the physical burden performed by the Plaintiff in Company B for six months and the injury or disease of this case,” on the ground that the injury or the basic factual relation of this case, which is the cause of the injury of this case, cannot be sought as additional injury or disease on the ground of another physical burden duty.” As to the assertion that “the existence of proximate causal relation exists between the injury or disease of this case,” the court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’

On February 13, 2018, the above judgment became final and conclusive by dismissal of the appeal.

E. On April 14, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) containers 25km feed at the upper half of the 25km in the workplace of a limited liability company for the first half of October 2012.