A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on September 30, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Prison on September 30, 2016.

"2017 Highest 148"

1. On October 23, 2016, the Defendant was committing the crime against the victim C at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and purchased a bet for the job offer of fishing tackles prepared by the victim C on the “E” bulletin board after accessing the Internet using smartphones.

“To send 520,000 won to B’s account” on the part of the above victim’s text message, and send B’s message to B’s account.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the above goods, and the amount received from the injured person was thought to be used as living expenses, etc., so even if he received the payment from the injured person, he did not have any intention or ability to send the goods to the injured person.

On October 24, 2016, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was remitted 520,000 won to the national bank account (F) in the name of the defendant as the price for goods from the victim.

2. On November 12, 2016, the Defendant, in committing the crime against the Victim G, purchased a new strawer, a motor vehicle product, which was prepared by the Victim G, after accessing the Internet using smartphones, at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and then accessing the Internet using smartphones.

“To send 160,000 won to B’s account” on the part of the said victim by communicating Kakao Stockholm messages to the said victim and sending it to B’s home.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the above goods, and there was no intention or ability to send the said goods to the victim even if he received the payment from the injured party, because he thought that the payment from the injured person was to be used as living expenses, etc.

The defendant is the victim as above.