A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than ten months for a crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant.

The punishment for the second crime in the holding shall be exempted.

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a maximum of one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, or a short of eight months, on April 4, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 13, 2016, and was exempted from the execution of the remaining punishment on August 20, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the closely-managed prison on August 20, 2016.

"2016 Highest 2691"

1. On October 24, 2016, the Defendant visited the Internet using smartphones at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gun E, and then purchased the “i53570-CPU” written by the Victim F on the “F” bulletin board.

The CPU will be sent to the CPU if the CPU is transferred to the Na’s account by communicating the victim with the Messenger via the Messenger.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the above goods, and the amount received from the injured person was thought to be used as living expenses, etc., so there was no intention or ability to send the goods even if he received the payment from the injured person.

As above, the Defendant: (a) received 80,000 won from the Daegu Bank Account (G) under the name of the Defendant for the same day from the injured party by deceiving the injured party as above; and (b) received from the victims the total amount of KRW 3,016,500 from the victims by the same method, such as the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 21 times until December 1, 2016.

"2017 Highest 193"

2. On May 31, 2015, the Defendant visited the Internet through smartphones from “IPC room” located in Daegu-gun H, and then purchased GTX750, which is a computer component, on the bulletin board of “China”.

The phrase “to send parts to the Na account” after making contact with the victim J’s cell phone and sending KRW 80,000 to the Na account.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have the above goods, and the price received from the injured person is thought to be used as living expenses, etc.