The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that the Defendant, around 11:00 on August 08, 2015, went to the scene after contact with the victim B (the age of 41) and C and C, who are his own denial during driving, came to the scene.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s statement, etc. states that “I will die if I would go back to the same line, I would see that I would die?” while stating that “I would go back to the same line, I would see that I would see that I would be above.” However, according to the Defendant’s legal statement, etc., I would like to say that I would see that I would see that I would die.

The breath dump was used to dump the chest and flap the chest once.

2. Determination and conclusion of this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. According to records, the victim can recognize facts that he/she expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.