logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.5.28.선고 2020고단27 판결
특수공무집행방해
Cases

200 Highest 27 Special Obstruction of Performance

Defendant

Transmission Dong (name), 70-years, South, and North

Residential Ulsan

Reference domicile

Prosecutor

Kim Jong-tae (Court Prosecution) and Kim U.S. (Court Decision)

Imposition of Judgment

May 28, 2020

Text

Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months. A person who has been seized shall be confiscated from the Defendant.

Reasons

Facts of crime

around 18:56 October 15, 2019, at the residence of the Defendant, the Defendant reported child abuse 112 to 00 apartment houses prior to his wife (10 years old). The Defendant was subject to separate protective measures by the police, specialized child protection agencies, Ulsannam-gu female families, and employees. The Defendant carried the hives (29 cm in total) that are dangerous and dangerous goods, and brought the hives (29 cm in length) around 09:45 on October 16, 2019, and 2333, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, and three children’s families and hone Star office, and the Defendant’s hives (10 years old), she took advantage of his or her legitimate duty, and she took advantage of his or her desire to make his or her child abuse in Korea, such as his or her official duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant

1. Statement of the police on this ○○;

1. Protocols of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and seized net photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and selection of punishment on the facts of crime;

Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

Although Defendant 1 recognized the crime and there is no penalty exceeding the fine, the crime of this case has been committed, on the grounds that the circumstances of child abuse against Defendant’s father and wife were separated and protected by the Gu office with the assistance of the police, the crime of this case is determined like the disposition of the order in consideration of the motive, circumstance, method and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, age of Defendant, environment, criminal record, etc., and the conditions of the punishment, such as the order of the order, on the ground that the act of this case was carried out separately and protected by the Gu office with the assistance of the police.

Judges

Judges Dom Line

arrow