logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.08.12 2015나105160
임금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around September 1994, the Defendant was an organization consisting of about 140 stores located in the Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, with a market opening permit from the head of Seo-gu, Daejeon pursuant to the former Do and Retail Trade Promotion Act (hereinafter “head of Seo-gu”). After doing so, the Defendant was deemed to have registered the establishment of a superstore under the Distribution Industry Development Act on July 1, 1997 pursuant to Article 3 of the Addenda of the Distribution Industry Development Act (amended by Act No. 5327, Apr. 10, 1997). The Defendant was deemed to have held the position of large-scale store manager under the Distribution Industry Development Act.

B. D: (a) on September 15, 2010, the head of the Seo-gu Office, and the Defendant’s representative was changed to D on August 25, 2010; (b) on September 20, 2010, the head of the Gu issued a written confirmation that the Defendant’s representative who is the superstore manager is changed to D; (c) on October 5, 2010, the registration of the change of the superstore was made with the content that the Defendant’s representative who is the superstore operator is changed to D.

C. From November 15, 2010 to December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) worked as an electrical owner at the Defendant prosperity; (b) written employment contract setting the period of work from January 1, 201 to December 31, 201; and (c) written employment contract setting the period of work from February 22, 2012 to December 31, 201, respectively.

On the other hand, on October 24, 201, the head of the Dong revoked the registration of the change of the superstore and notified D thereof on the ground that D did not submit evidentiary documents that D was elected as the representative through the procedures prescribed by the defendant's prosperity rules.

E. On December 16, 2011, E convened a representative meeting of the Defendant on the position of “Chairperson of Emergency Countermeasures against the Bprosperity”, and accordingly, E is a new representative at the representative meeting held on December 22, 201.

arrow