The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The specification of the facts charged

A. On May 27, 1998, the defendant's employee, violation of the restriction on operation at the Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 12.2 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 12.2 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 1471-2's 1471-2's Gyeong-si's 1423.5 km-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's Gyeong-si's 1999.

2. The penal provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost its effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint) Decided October 28, 2010), and thus, the Defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.