A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:20 on April 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that CJ was wraped in front of D, and that CJ was wraped in front of DJ; and (b) when wraped by E and F (year 51) from the victim, the Defendant humddddd the victim’s face one time by drinking the victim’s face; and (c) assaulted the victim’s left side by one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness F’s legal statement (the defendant is only a citizen’s face once, and the victim does not have any fact at the time. However, in full view of each evidence, such as the witness F’s statement in this court and investigative agency’s statement (which does not seem to have any circumstance to mislead the defendant differently from the fact) of credibility in light of consistency, physical strength and rationality of the statement, and the degree of attitude of the statement in this court, etc., the defendant can sufficiently recognize the criminal facts of the judgment that the victim committed the second assaulting the victim once again.)

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act shall apply to the defendant, since the defendant has committed violence again even though he/she has committed several times of violence, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, taking into account

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;