A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 4, 2018, the Defendant who damages property: (a) sought money from the studio C in the studio C in which the victim B resides; and (b) paid money from the studio around the studio under the influence of alcohol.

During the studio parking lot, it was damaged that 15,000 won of the repair cost was damaged by breaking the front of the Do SM5 car owned by the victim, which is parked in the studio parking lot.

2. On February 4, 2018, at around 22:59, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112, stating “a person who is suffering from disturbance” at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and received a request from F to inform him of his personal information from the police officer belonging to the Dong-gu Police Station E division of Dong-gu, Police Station E division of the Defendant, who was called out.

v. They have inevitably expressed my view that he would be able to say that he would be able to say that he would be flick, that he would be arrested, and that he would be able to flickly and flickly flickly and flickly.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. point of obstructing the performance of official duties in accordance with relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense: Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order: The fact that the accused has no criminal record subject to a more severe punishment than a fine, the confession of him/her, his/her mistake is divided, and the extent of violence and obstruction of public duties is not serious: The fact that the State's legal order is established and the punishment for the crime of obstructing the performance of public duties is required to eradicate the light of public authority;