logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.05.15 2018고정39
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

(b) the body of the sports center will be changed if the H and police officers hear and “Ambbin instructor at the sports center is fishing big instructor without qualification and qualification, and an instructor flows into the water of the sports center;

“Fastly sound”.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

3. On September 5, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on September 5, 2017: (a) in the J’s work room operated by the Defendant’s spouse in Gangwon-gun I on September 5, 2017, using a computer installed therein, and the victim, after accessing the bulletin board of the freedom of website of the Human Affairs and Home Organization by using a computer installed therein, had been employed by due process by the Korean Sport and Olympic Committee of the Human Affairs and Sports after obtaining the life instructor’s license; and (b) in spite of the fact that the victim was employed by due process

The title "C is used for employing a lecturer who does not have "(a leader's certificate, a Egbbbbbin's certificate)" as the title "."

에어로빅 자격증이 없어 명칭도 바꿨다고

Haba도요

******* It is difficult to say that the dancing also 70-80% of the Embbbbbin action is gly and eroding even though it does not know about, whether it is difficult to know about, or not, its quality, and how it will be brupted with some members, and how it will be brudd with several members, and that it is not Ahind only C water.

In light of the content of “the victim”, the victim insultings the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to D, H, E, G, and F;

1. The defendant asserts that he does not have an intention of insult on the free bulletin board of the President of the Korean Tribunal and the President of the Korean National Assembly.

According to the above evidence, the Defendant made a public statement to the effect that the victimized person is not qualified and not qualified on two occasions throughout the period of time as indicated in its reasoning, and posted the same article as indicated in its reasoning on the bulletin board of the National Assembly website, thereby damaging the social evaluation of the injured person.

(c).

arrow